And In The “Well, That Didn’t Take Long” Dept.

Share Button

Arguably the most prominent of the successful Tea Party winners from last Tuesday,   Rand “No — no more earmarks.” Paul now supports earmarks for his home state.

Honestly, I hadn’t expected the pledge to cut earmarks to last long, but I didn’t expect it to crumble in a week, and I certainly didn’t expect Rand Paul to be among the first to abandon this pledge. Oh well, as Glenn Reynolds likes to say – Meet the new boss, yadda, yadda. yadda….

The Sinking Of The Edmund Fitzgerald – 35 Year Ago Today.

Share Button

Here are more meteorological details than you ever thought you’d know about this tragedy . Like many of my generation, I only know of the story through the lyrics of the Gordon Lightfoot song about the ship. As a kid, I remember listening to the song, and thinking that the Edmund Fitz must have been a real ship, and it was a sad story. It was hard to understand the lyrics coming through the tiny speaker of our little portable Radio Shack AM radio, great technology for 1976… it’s what we all had in the day. But the song, with its Witch Of November storm, had, and still has, a mystical quality about it.

Here’s a video of the GL song, with some vintage news footage covering the event. This is also dedicated to my dad, who so loved Lightfoots music. Enjoy.

Crap. I just got done watching the whole video. They list the names of the sailors lost, and I started to tear up a bit. When did I become so vulnerable to this kind of thing?

————————————————————————-

PS. The song has a great guitar tone. Wonder what he was using?

PPS.

Uh Oh – China may be bigger economy than US within two years

Share Button

That’s the headline. But it’s not all a loss – We’ll still get the brunt of the blame for all the global warming and stuff.

Real Genius – Has It Been 25 Years????

Share Button

rgkilmer

I can’t believe it’s been that long since the release of the uber-funny classic with Val Kilmer, before he got all serious and Doc Holiday on us! It was by far one of the best comedies from the 80’s.  Such wonderful dialog!

Chris Knight: So, if there’s anything I can do for you, or, more to the point, to you, you just let me know.
Susan: Can you hammer a six-inch spike through a board with your penis?
Chris Knight: Not right now.
Susan: A girl’s gotta have her standards.

Jordan: Are you going to take me home to meet your parents?
Mitch: No.
Jordan: Why? Are you ashamed of me?
Mitch: No, them.
Jordan: Oh.

Chris Knight: You see Mitch, I used to be you. And lately I’ve been missing me so I asked Dr. Hathaway if I could room with me again and he said sure.

And one that I’ve used too many times… except with my own identity of course!

Darlington Recruiter: You *are* Chris Knight, aren’t you?
Chris Knight: I hope so. I’m wearing his underwear.

Here is a sample of the zany humor you’ll find throughout the movie.

Fun RG trivia (if you believe wiki) – To promote the film, the studio held what they billed as “the world’s first computer press conference” with Coolidge and Grazer answering journalists’ questions via computer terminals and relayed over the CompuServe computer network.

Sarah Palin Versus Reading Comprehension!

Share Button

Either that, or she has a DeLorean Time Machine, in which case I apologizes in advance.

So, upon my usual morning web surfing, I came across this headline:

Sarah Palin Shreds WSJ Reporter For Not Being Able To Read His Own Paper

Uh Oh, some reporter from the “lame-stream press” as she is so fond of labeling anything that isn’t run by FOX or Roger Murdoch… wait, she’s criticizing someone who writes for the Wall Street Journal? Hmmm, I wonder if she knows it’s owned by Murdoch?

Oh well, I got side-bared. Moving along.

She criticizes the report thusly on her ever handy Facebook page:

Ever since 2008, people seem inordinately interested in my reading habits. Among various newspapers, magazines, and local Alaskan papers, I read the Wall Street Journal.

So, imagine my dismay when I read an article by Sudeep Reddy in today’s Wall Street Journal criticizing the fact that I mentioned inflation in my comments about QE2 in a speech this morning before a trade-association. Here’s what I said: “everyone who ever goes out shopping for groceries knows that prices have risen significantly over the past year or so. Pump priming would push them even higher.”

Mr. Reddy takes aim at this. He writes: “Grocery prices haven’t risen all that significantly, in fact.” Really? That’s odd, because just last Thursday, November 4, I read an article in Mr. Reddy’s own Wall Street Journal titled “Food Sellers Grit Teeth, Raise Prices: Packagers and Supermarkets Pressured to Pass Along Rising Costs, Even as Consumers Pinch Pennies.”

Sudeep Reddy, you stupid lame-stream media person, you don’t even know what your talking about!… Or does he? Mrs. Palin provides a clue when she notes this little fact from an article that was published November 4:

The article noted that “an inflationary tide is beginning to ripple through America’s supermarkets and restaurants…Prices of staples including milk, beef, coffee, cocoa and sugar have risen sharply in recent months.”

Note the statement in bold “is beginning“, which means the inflationary trend is just beginning, and hasn’t been occurring. It gets better. If we read the very next sentence, you’ll see the issue at hand is laid out quite clearly:

And food makers and retailers including McDonald’s Corp., Kellogg Co. and Kroger Co. have begun to signal that they’ll try to make consumers shoulder more of the higher costs for ingredients.

It continues:

For food executives, how quickly to pass along higher costs presents difficult choices. Missteps could be costly when the economy remains weak. Many Americans, nervous about high unemployment, have pledged allegiance to their pennies and are willing to trade down on brands, switch supermarkets, opt for Burger King over Applebee’s, or stop dining out altogether to save money.

“The big challenge will be, how much can we swallow and how much can we pass along?” said Jack Brown, chief executive of Stater Bros. Markets, a 167-store grocery chain in southern California.

Stater Bros. has seen the prices it pays for cereal rise 5% in recent months. The chain has passed about half the increase on to consumers while making up for the rest by trimming other expenses, such as what it spends on cell phones and delivery truck tires.

Kraft Foods Inc., Sara Lee Corp. and General Mills Inc. already have said they’ll raise prices on certain items. Starbucks Corp. backtracked on an August announcement that it would hold coffee prices steady, saying in September it would boost prices of larger and hard-to-make drinks. This week, cereal maker Kellogg hinted that it will be raising prices, without disclosing specifics.

Grocery chains Safeway Inc. and Kroger have said they’ll pass supplier increases along to consumers

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. executives told investors last month that they expect “very moderate” inflation next year. For now, Jack Sinclair, Wal-Mart’s executive vice president of grocery merchandise, said it would be “difficult” to hike retail prices because demand remains weak.

Note the future tense of the predicates: “they’ll raise prices”, “it would boost prices”, “it will be raising prices”, “they’ll pass supplier increases along”. With the exception of one store chain, every merchant discussed in this article is discussing how they are going to pass along the inflationary cost to their customers in future price increases. Most of the retailers, including conservative favorite Wal Mart, have do far resisted raising prices. In other words, the inflation is in the pipeline. As far as your average shopping experience, for the most part, it’s not here yet. This does not jive with Sarah’s assertion that “everyone who ever goes out shopping for groceries knows that prices have risen significantly over the past year or so“.

Remember that the article I originally linked to was titled: “Sarah Palin Shreds WSJ Reporter For Not Being Able To Read His Own Paper”

Shreds?… Really????

With the exception of the rise in fruit and veggie cost. normal for this time of year, I haven’t noticed much inflation in my shopping bills. Which makes me wonder if Todd is the one who does most of the shopping in the Palin household?

She closes thusly:

Now I realize I’m just a former governor and current housewife from Alaska, but even humble folks like me can read the newspaper…

As I’ve demonstrated… No. You can’t.

Conservatives, can you please stop taking her seriously.

PS: Lame-stream reporter Sudeep Reddy responds:

A broad measure of food prices from the Labor Department shows prices rose at an average annual rate of less than 0.6% in the first nine months of the year. September’s increase in food prices — 1.4% for food and beverages at an annual rate — was low by historical standards.(In fact, the lowest average annual inflation rate on record was 1.4%, in 1992.) Commerce Department inflation data show a similarly slow year-over-year increase for food prices, 1.3%.

While some items in the shopping cart have risen in price (ground chuck beef is up 4.8%) and others have decreased (bananas are down 5.3%), overall food price inflation has been historically low for the past year. This is not surprising. Weak demand, high unemployment and thrifty shoppers have led retailers to keep many prices from rising despite the rising cost of some commodities, including coffee and sugar.

The Nov. 4 Wall Street Journal article noted “the tamest year of food pricing in nearly two decades.” It does indeed report that supermarkets and restaurants are facing cost pressures that could push their retail prices higher — but it hasn’t happened yet on a large scale. Critics of the Fed’s quantitative easing policy are focused primarily on concerns about potential future inflation.

In other words… What I said!!! 🙂

Laugh Of The Day! Opinion – Uninterrupted; Olbermann unsuspended.

Share Button

Golly, I do hope those two days off learned him a lesson!

Restating my assertion that Keith Olbermann never should have been suspended, NBC has thankfully ended it. He’ll be back on the air on Tuesday. Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not a fan of Olbermann’s program by any means, but to punish him, for providing hints that he might be partisan???? Olbermann… Partisan…. Nah! Anyway, here is NBC’s rationale for suspending him. If you’re drinking coffee or milk, swallow first before you read this:

Like many news organizations, including The Washington Post, NBC News prohibits its employees from making political contributions, a ban designed to prevent the appearance of partisanship by a news organization.

MSNBC, the home of Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, Ed Schultz, Chris Mathews… Biased??? Nah. Couldn’t be. I’ll give nutral observer Rachel Maddow the final word:

“Let this incident lay to rest forever the facile, never-true-anyway, bull-pucky, lazy conflation of Fox News and what the rest of us do for a living,” she said on her program Friday. “Hosts on Fox News raise money for Republican candidates. They endorse them explicitly, they use their Fox News profile to headline fundraisers. . . . We are a news operation, and the rules around here are part of how you know that.”

PS. Maybe, it could be said that FOX News policy is on the cutting edge – transparency and openness and all that. The U S government could take lessons.

No More Politics….

Share Button

For at least three days. Gonna be recording some songs.

The Price Is Wrong!!!!

Share Button

This is the part where “The Price Is Right” music plays in your head.

The price, of course, is for the trip to India President Obama is about to take. According to conservative rabble-rouser Mike Huckabee and Rep.  Michele Backmann, President Obama’s trip will be costing $200 million per day!

WOW! Great Headline!

Too bad it’s almost certainly absurdly way off the mark and wrong. Here is some examples of the costs of previous trips, made during the Clinton administration.

The GAO said that Clinton’s trips to Africa, Chile and China in 1998 cost at least $42.8 million, $10.5 million and $18.8 million, respectively — not counting the still-classified cost of providing Secret Service protection.

In Africa, Clinton was accompanied by about 1,300 individuals — not including members of the Secret Service — representing the White House, the Department of Defense and other federal agencies. The president visited six countries in 12 days, which means the trip cost $3.6 million per day.

Clinton made the five-day Chile trip in order to attend the second Summit of the Americas — a meeting of 34 heads of state or governments from countries in the Americas — and to hold meetings with the president of Chile. About 600 individuals accompanied the president on the trip, which we calculated would have cost $2.1 million per day.

When Clinton visited China to conduct talks with the president of China, he brought along about 500 individuals. The trip lasted nine days, which works out to a little less than $2.1 million per day.
The total cost including Secret Service protection would of course be somewhat higher, but even doubling or tripling those figures and adding in an adjustment for inflation would not produce anything close to the figure given by the Indian news article for Obama’s trip.

Although there has been some inflation since the Clinton years, the cost for security is probably higher now, post 9/11, than it was during the Clinton years, and the White House isn’t releasing the cost of this trip (which they probably should), I’m certain that there is no way they could possibly spend $200 million dollars a day, which is about $10 million less than we spend per day on the war on Afghanistan, which is estimated at $190 million per day….

Hey, why don’t we start cost cutting there!

Anyway, speaking of “The Price Is Right”, the Huckabee / Backmann / Rush is about as wrong as Jose’s first bid. This poor guy at least has an excuse for being so wrong. He’s a guy. He’s in the Navy. Probably doesn’t have much time to spend pricing stuff in between sailing the world and all that… Now, if the showcase would have included something involving beer and kegs and what not, then, well, he probably would have certain got the price much closer to right.

Hat Tip: David @ The Debate Link.

Sarah Palin – The “Carefully Crafted” Politician.

Share Button

My friend Dan at Gay Patriot is GaGa over the latest piece by Sarah Palin posted over at National Review. He writes:

She gets it:

The meaning of the 2010 election was rebuke, reject, and repeal. We rebuked Washington’s power grab, rejected this unwanted “fundamental transformation of America,” and began the process to repeal the dangerous policies inflicted on us. But this theme will only complement the theme of 2012, which is renew, revive, and restore. In 2012, we need to renew our optimistic, pioneering spirit, revive our free-market system, and restore constitutional limits and our standing in the world as the abiding beacon of freedom.

If you are a conservative, reads nice… No, not nice… Grand!

But when I read the piece, which provides a list of things conservatives need to do in order to win in 2012, there was a bit, a nugget of unintended revelation, that troubled me to no end.

The last, and possibly most important, lesson is that a winning conservative message must always be carefully crafted.

Uhm…

“…a winning conservative message must always be carefully crafted”???

Really. I thought that the appeal of the true conservative message was that it was so basic, so fundamental, that it’s appeal was easy to understand.

“…a winning conservative message must always be carefully crafted

Would this explain why are you so afraid to give interviews to networks other than FOX, as your carefully crafted message may not be as well crafted as you think and it might fall apart upon unfriendly examination? She desires to be able to speak “without the constrains of the lame-stream filter“, so she will use the conservative one instead?

“…a winning conservative message must always be carefully crafted

Guys, that’s called, uhm, propaganda. Haven’t we already suffered enough at the hands of other politicians who have had to rely on their message being “carefully crafted”?

The Nation review piece was “carefully crafted” to propel her coming campaign. You may agree with the sentiments expressed in the article, but, as someone who has spent some time grading papers over the years, I guarantee this is not her thoughts – i.e. she didn’t write it. It’s not in her hand. It’s not in her voice. This has “ghost writer” written all over it! It is, indeed, a “carefully crafted” message.

Comment Of The Day! Noonan, On Palin Trying To Be A Reagan

Share Button

The point is not “He was a great man and you are a nincompoop,” though that is true….

Oh Snap!!!! Read the whole thing. Now THIS is good thoughtful post-election punditry!